Greensill: Can you explain risk management in SCF to a select committee?
Amid the ongoing litigations and investigations related to Greensill Capital, including the eagerly awaited UK Serious Fraud Office investigation into Sanjeev Gupta’s GFG Alliance, TXF outlines the latest instalment of the Greensill saga, which continues apace.
In the wake of the collapse of Greensill Capital a new benchmark has emerged for supply chain finance (SCF) providers: can you explain risk management in SCF to a UK parliamentary select committee?
MPs asked as much from failed financier Lex Greensill earlier this month in the committee’s parliamentary probe, which focuses on "the regulatory lessons from the failure of Greensill Capital and the appropriateness of HM Treasury's response to lobbying in relation to Greensill Capital".
Greensill’s answers were polished (versed in the sort of financial vernacular that got him there in the first place) as he laid out the nuances of SCF. But of all the topics discussed, the main takeaway was the SCF industry’s possible over-reliance on trade credit insurance and in particular the impact of insurance termination on funds.
Had BCC (formerly The Bond & Credit Co), a division of Tokio Marine Insurance acquired in 2019, decided to renew its credit insurance policy with Greensill Capital - which covered $4.6 billion of payables relating to 40 clients - then the firm would be here today, at least according to Lex Greensill, who blamed his company’s collapse on the Sydney-based subsidiary's refusal to roll over cover just days before the policy expired (1 March).
In reality, the obvious issue is what was insured in the first place? Were the insured assets based on accounts receivable under Greensill’s arrangement, as Tokio Marine says - or was lending also backed by nebulously-defined ‘future’ receivables, a SCF play Greensill wielded far too readily to dress up unsecured loans? It is still unclear.
Some light might well be shed on the matter given that last week Tokio Marine hired external investigators to examine the validity of the insurance contracts it had with Greensill. The Japanese firm, which dismissed an underwriter last July for exceeding risk limits in relation to Greensill, also argues a large portion of its exposure to Greensill is covered via reinsurance. But Tokio Marine investors aren’t convinced, questioning the lack of detail regarding reinsurance arrangements and again, what exactly the BCC policies covered.
What is clear, is the fundamentals of trade credit insurance are to match the assets and what is being insured. Tokio Marine said this month it had recently engaged in efforts to improve governance and control processes after the recent problems at BCC, and scrutiny from analysts at S&P Global Ratings. Although the exact improvement efforts have not been divulged either.
For a firm doing traditional SCF - such as lending against confirmed short-term invoices with matching insurance - the impact of withdrawal, at either individual or policy level, would be the inability to write new business for these clients, not existing investments, says one market source. For traditional SCF with matching insurance, this would likely just cause a reduction of business volume or the ordinary winding down of funds.
So in short, the catastrophic impact of insurance withdrawal is likely to be a function of a particular business model - like the use of ‘future’ receivables, not insurance.
While Japanese insurers can implement certain controls, the Greensill incident should spark a review of not just their risk management levels, but also how they educate employees of their international subsidiaries. This is especially the case given similar issues could be lurking in other divisions of Tokio Marine after years of expansion. For example, it acquired a 50% stake in Insurance Australia Group (IAG) in 2019. IAG later said that it had offloaded its own Greensill exposure to Tokio Marine as part of that sale.
The Japanese company’s litigation could prove a defence against any potential Greensill-related claims. And likewise, the raft of investigations and litigations related to Greensill are likely to unearth additional material for the insurer’s defense.
Credit Suisse, which suspended redemptions from its SCF funds after the lapse in Greensill’s insurance cover, conceded last week that some of its funds’ investors had threatened litigation, with only $3 billion so far having been returned to investors out of $10 billion in trapped funds; multiple parties are eagerly awaiting the Serious Fraud Office investigations into Sanjeev Gupta’s GFG Alliance; BlueStone Resources in the US is suing Greensill for lending lumpy amounts (some based on prospective receivables) and then going bust; and on Monday, an Italian bank - Agis Banca - announced its collapsed through significant exposure to Greensill Capital and GFG Alliance.
So was there a scandalous lack of due diligence performed by more than one underwriter at BCC? Or has an unscrupulous wolf just entered the global trade finance flock in sheep’s clothing? After all, Greensill and Gupta were doing far more than just trade and SCF. Only time, and the external inquiries, will tell.
Become a TXF subscriber for unrestricted access to TXFnews.com 365 days a year
Contact us for individual and team rates by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org
Take a look below at a selection of exclusive subscriber articles published last week
Is the OECD Consensus too inflexible for emerging markets?
Since the introduction of the OECD Consensus over forty years ago, the framework has acquired numerous updates - most recently an increase to the local content requirement limit for ECA cover. Welcome though this may have been, the Consensus is still regarded as too inflexible, especially for emerging markets....Read on here
Adani's Rajasthan renewables hybrid debt commitments in
Adani Green Energy received bank commitments yesterday for parts of its certified green project debt package, designed to initially fund its...Read on here
Manah I & II solar bids due next week amid schedule change
Oman Power & Water Procurement (OPWP) is expected to receive bids next week for the 1GW Manah I and II solar projects. OPWP – which is being advised by...Read on here
Assiut oil refinery expansion project financing delayed
The $1.3 billion ECA-covered financing backing the Assiut oil refinery expansion project in Egypt - sponsored via the Assiut National Oil Processing Company (ANOPC), a project vehicle established in 2018 by state-owned Egyptian General Petroleum Corp's subsidiary Assiut Oil Refining Co - has been...Read on here
Bank commitments in for Uralkali’s oversubscribed ESG-tied PXF
Bank commitments have landed for Uralkali’s first ever ESG-tied loan, which was launched at the end of March. Although an exact volume has...Read on here
Viterra upsizes and shaves margin on ESG-linked RCF
Signed on 12 May, Viterra – previously known as Glencore Agriculture - has reached...Read on here
More details emerge on Traxys’ $1.3bn multi-currency RCF
Signed on 4 May, Luxembourg-headquartered metals and natural resources trader Traxys secured a $1.3 billion four-tranche facility. Amongst the large syndication of lenders, bookrunning mandated lead arrangers (BMLAs) were...Read on here